Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal
Abstract
The article argues that local governments should not restrict citizens' non-verbal expressions, such as eye-rolling, during public meetings unless there is a compelling reason. It emphasizes that such restrictions must be viewpoint-neutral and narrowly tailored to maintain the balance between order and First Amendment rights.
Disciplines
Labor and Employment Law | Law | State and Local Government Law
Recommended Citation
Sarah Klaper,
The Eye-Roll Heard 'Round the World: Protecting Citizens' Free Speech and Petition Rights in Accessing Local Government,
10
Cardozo Pub. L. Pol’y & Ethics J.
299
(2012).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cplpej/vol10/iss2/3
COinS