Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
Abstract
The article argues that post-9/11 U.S. government policies, particularly the monitoring of attorney-client communications and the indictment of Lynne Stewart, significantly erode the attorney-client privilege and the Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel. These actions, justified under national security, undermine constitutional protections and set a dangerous precedent for legal representation, especially for controversial or politically sensitive cases.
Disciplines
Communications Law | Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Law | Law Enforcement and Corrections | Legal Profession
Recommended Citation
Heidi Boghosian,
Taint Teams and Firewalls: Thin Armor for Attorney-Client Privilege,
1
Cardozo Pub. L. Pol’y & Ethics J.
15
(2003).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cplpej/vol1/iss1/4
Included in
Communications Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Legal Profession Commons