Cardozo Law Review
Abstract
Social media inflict multiple harms on liberal democracy. Online platforms thrive on propagating emotionally inflammatory content that maximizes user engagement. Too often that entails amplifying disinformation, hate speech, online extremism, and deep-seated partisan animosity. Tellingly, as documented in testimony before the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack, in the weeks following the 2020 presidential election, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Reddit knowingly enabled a firestorm of vitriolic far-right election denial on their platforms. In so doing, a Select Committee staff report concludes, the platforms “helped to facilitate the attack on January 6th.”
Keywords
Social Media, Utilities, Communications Law, International Law, Military Law and Justice, Terrorism, Crimes Against the State, Athletes, Education Law, First Amendment
Disciplines
Communications Law | Education Law | First Amendment | International Law | Law | Military, War, and Peace
Recommended Citation
Neil Netanel,
Applying Militant Democracy to Defend Against Social Media Harms,
45
Cardozo L. Rev.
489
(2023).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/clr/vol45/iss2/4
Included in
Communications Law Commons, Education Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, International Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons