Cardozo Law Review
Abstract
Part I describes the history of custody and incarceration requirements in PC DNA testing statutes, as well as the interaction between those requirements and state sex offender registration acts. Part II analyzes a number of custody and incarceration requirements across various states. Part III proposes the elimination of custody requirements from PC DNA testing statutes and rebuts concerns about removing these requirements. Ultimately, this Note argues that custody and incarceration requirements specifically harm those who have been wrongly convicted of sex offenses, and the requirements' fundamental incongruity with the goals of PC DNA testing support their complete elimination from PC DNA testing regimes.
Disciplines
Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Evidence | Law
Recommended Citation
Ian J. Postman,
Re-Examining Custody and Incarceration Requirements in Postconviction DNA Testing Statutes,
40
Cardozo L. Rev.
1723
(2019).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/clr/vol40/iss4/5
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Evidence Commons