Framed by Forensics: Fulfilling Daubert's Gatekeeping Function by Segregating Science from the Adversarial Model

Authors

Kayla Marie Mannucci, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Abstract

The note argues that flawed forensic expert testimony significantly contributes to wrongful convictions, undermining the criminal justice system's objective to acquit the innocent. It highlights how partisan bias, lack of scientific validation, and inadequate judicial gatekeeping under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have led to the admission of unreliable forensic evidence. The note proposes a reform: requiring neutral, court-appointed experts in high-stakes forensic cases to ensure objective testimony and prevent partisan bias.

Disciplines

Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Evidence | Law | Legal History

Recommended Citation

Kayla M. Mannucci, Framed by Forensics: Fulfilling Daubert's Gatekeeping Function by Segregating Science from the Adversarial Model, 39 Cardozo L. Rev. 1947 (2018).
Available at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/clr/vol39/iss5/9