Cardozo Law Review
Vol. 13, Iss. 2-3
The Cardozo Law Review would like to thank Jacob Burns and the Jacob Burns Institute for Advanced Legal Studies for sponsoring the Decision and Inference in Litigation Conference.Prefatory Matter
Conferences
Decision and Inference
Peter Tillers
Proving Your Case - Evidence and Procedure in Action
Christopher Finlayson
The New Evidence Scholarship
William Twining
Some Caveats Concerning DNA as Criminal Identification Evidence: With Thanks to the Reverend Bayes
Richard Lempert
Stories, Forensic Science, and Improved Verdicts
Randolph N. Jonakait
The Admissibility of DNA Testing
D. H. Kaye
What DNA “Fingerprinting” Can Teach the Law About the Rest of Forensic Science
Michael J. Saks and Jonathan J. Koehler
The Nature of Juridicial Proof
Ronald J. Allen
It Will Be Pleasanter to Tell You a Story
Linda R. Hirshman
Stories and Numbers
John Leubsdorf
Should a Jury Say What It Believes or What It Accepts?
L. Jonathan Cohen
The State of Mind Necessary for a Juridical Verdict
Ronald J. Allen
A Reply to Allen
L. Jonathan Cohen
On the Allocation of Burdens of Proof in Corporate Law: An Essay on Fairness and Fuzzy Sets
Charles M. Yablon
A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model
Nancy Pennington and Reid Hastie
Telling Tales in Court: Trial Procedure and the Story Model
Richard Lempert
Mistrial by Likelihood Ratio: Bayesian Analysis Meets the F-Word
Paul Bergman and Al Moore
Extending the Conversation About Bayes
Bernard Robertson and G. A. Vignaux
Credal Probablity
D. H. Kaye
Marshalling Evidence for Adversary Litigation
David Schum and Peter Tillers
Marshalling Information Prior to Litigation
Bernard Robertson
Five Cheers for Schum and Tillers
William Twining
Decision, Disciplined Inferences and the Adversary Process
Robert S. Thompson
Refocusing the New Evidence Scholarship
Terence J. Anderson
Incentives to Spoliate Evidence in Civil Litigation: The Need for Vigorous Judicial Action
Charles R. Nesson
Hear No Evil, See No Evil: A Comment on Professor Nesson’s Claims About Evidence Suppression
Dale A. Nance
Comment on Nesson
Joseph Gastwirth
Missing Evidence
Dale A. Nance
Improving the Procedure for Resolving Hearsay Issues
Richard D. Friedman
Procedural Options for Resolving Hearsay Issues
Roger C. Park
The Morality of Statistical Proof and the Risk of Mistaken Liability
David T. Wasserman
A Comment on Wasserman’s “The Morality of Statistical Proof and the Risk of Mistaken Liability”
L. Jonathan Cohen
Reply to Cohen: Common Sense About Naked Statistics
David T. Wasserman
Connectionism and Legal Inference
Paul Thagard
New Paradigms for Reasoning With Uncertain Information
Ronald R. Yager
Comment on Edwards: Ward Edwards and the New Bayesian Software
David T. Wasserman