Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Abstract
The purpose of this Note is to posit that arbitration, tailored for counterfeiting disputes, could potentially serve as a reliable method for fashion companies to combat counterfeiting. Part II discusses the background of IP rights and the relationship between counterfeiting and fashion. Part III highlights the traditional advantages of ADR and how some of those advantages may become disadvantages when applied to counterfeiting disputes. Lastly, Part IV argues that arbitration can be designed to be applicable to counterfeiting disputes described in this Note.
Disciplines
Consumer Protection Law | Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Intellectual Property Law | Law | Law Enforcement and Corrections
Recommended Citation
Anan Kahari,
The Devil's Advocate Also Wears Prada: The Impracticality of ADR in Counterfeiting Disputes and the Prospect of Arbitration,
19
Cardozo J. Conflict Resol.
731
(2018).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjcr/vol19/iss3/7
Included in
Consumer Protection Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons