Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Abstract
This Note examines PED use in college sports, focusing primarily on cognitive enhancing drugs as an example of a common lethal PED, and the current NCAA drug-testing regulations and disciplinary process to explore its efficiency and fairness. Then, the Note proposes changes to the NCAA protocol, specifically changes to the appeals process for student-athletes who fail drug tests for PED use and request a review of the disciplinary actions taken against them by the NCAA.
Disciplines
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Education Law | Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law | Food and Drug Law | Law | Medical Jurisprudence
Recommended Citation
David Swiedler,
Is it Time to Pay Attention? Critiquing the Cognitive Enhancement Drug Policies and Appeals Process in United States Collegiate Sports,
18
Cardozo J. Conflict Resol.
489
(2017).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjcr/vol18/iss2/9
Included in
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Education Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons