Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Abstract
In this Article, I will not only argue that bioethics mediation is a superior approach for resolving ethics conflicts, but I will also defend the controversial position that it is the only ethically justifiable method for resolving values-based conflicts in a pluralistic society. Although it has so far been relegated to the status of mere handmaiden to conventional consultation, bioethics mediation-as its detractors have surmised-has the potential to end clinical ethics consultation as we know it.
Disciplines
Bioethics and Medical Ethics | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility | Medical Jurisprudence | Medicine and Health Sciences
Recommended Citation
Autumn Fiester,
Bioethics Mediation & the End of Clinical Ethics As We Know It,
15
Cardozo J. Conflict Resol.
501
(2014).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjcr/vol15/iss2/7
Included in
Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons