Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
Abstract
The note examines the legal frameworks addressing Holocaust denial in the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, and the United States, highlighting the need for more robust legislation to combat Holocaust denial effectively. It argues that while countries like Germany and Austria have stringent laws criminalizing Holocaust denial, jurisdictions like the U.S. and U.K. rely on civil remedies, which may be insufficient. The analysis advocates for adopting legal measures that balance free speech with the protection of historical truth and human dignity.
Disciplines
Comparative and Foreign Law | International Law | Law | Law and Society | Legal History | Torts
Recommended Citation
Madeline Epstein,
Holocaust Denial Legislation in the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, and the United States: How the Law Presently Addresses the Issue and Proposals for Reform,
7
Cardozo Int’l & Compar. L. Rev.
251
(2024).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/ciclr/vol7/iss1/8
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Torts Commons