Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
Abstract
The note critiques the lack of a unified regulatory framework for addressing sexual misconduct in U.K. universities, contrasting it with the structured, albeit controversial, Title IX system in the U.S. It argues that the U.K.'s voluntary approach has led to inconsistent, unjust outcomes and advocates for the adoption of a comprehensive regulatory regime similar to Title IX to ensure fairness, accountability, and consistency in handling such cases.
Disciplines
Comparative and Foreign Law | Constitutional Law | Contracts | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Education Law | Evidence | Fourteenth Amendment | International Law | Law | Law and Gender
Recommended Citation
Marc Siegel,
An Examination of U.S. and U.K. Procedures Governing Sexual Misconduct Investigations in Universities,
6
Cardozo Int’l & Compar. L. Rev.
659
(2023).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/ciclr/vol6/iss2/9
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Education Law Commons, Evidence Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons