Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
Abstract
The note examines the contrasting approaches of the United States and the European Union to digital privacy, emphasizing how the US prioritizes liberty while the EU focuses on dignity. It argues that US privacy law, particularly under the Fourth Amendment, struggles to adapt to technological advancements, as seen in cases like Carpenter v. United States. In contrast, the EU's framework, guided by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, offers more comprehensive protections by addressing the broader context of data collection and processing. The author suggests that the US could enhance its privacy protections by adopting elements of the EU's approach.
Disciplines
Comparative and Foreign Law | Consumer Protection Law | Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | International Law | International Trade Law | Law | Science and Technology Law
Recommended Citation
Virginia Kozemczak,
Dignity, Freedom, and Digital Rights: Comparing American and European Approaches to Privacy,
4
Cardozo Int’l & Compar. L. Rev.
1069
(2021).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/ciclr/vol4/iss3/9
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons