•  
  •  
 

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Abstract

The note argues that government regulation of interior landmarks should be contingent upon public access, as such regulation otherwise fails to serve its intended public benefit and unjustly burdens property owners. It proposes that without public access, landmark designation should not impose regulatory obligations on property owners, and suggests that the financial burden of preservation should shift to taxpayers rather than private owners.

Disciplines

Administrative Law | Banking and Finance Law | Comparative and Foreign Law | International Law | Land Use Law | Law | Legal Remedies

Share

COinS