Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
Abstract
The note argues that government regulation of interior landmarks should be contingent upon public access, as such regulation otherwise fails to serve its intended public benefit and unjustly burdens property owners. It proposes that without public access, landmark designation should not impose regulatory obligations on property owners, and suggests that the financial burden of preservation should shift to taxpayers rather than private owners.
Disciplines
Administrative Law | Banking and Finance Law | Comparative and Foreign Law | International Law | Land Use Law | Law | Legal Remedies
Recommended Citation
Victoria Tesone,
Interior Landmark Designation and Regulation: Should Government Regulate Publicity Inaccessible Interior Landmarks,
4
Cardozo Int’l & Compar. L. Rev.
979
(2021).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/ciclr/vol4/iss3/6
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Banking and Finance Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, International Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Legal Remedies Commons