Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
Abstract
The article explores the complexities and future of Section 230, focusing on its role in protecting online platforms from liability for user-generated content. Panelists argue that Section 230 is an immunity, not a subsidy, and discuss its implications for content moderation, new technologies, and regulatory oversight. They propose various reforms, including FTC regulation and clarifying Section 230's scope for emerging harms.
Disciplines
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law | First Amendment | Intellectual Property Law | Jurisprudence | Law
Recommended Citation
Enrique Armijo, Paul M. Barrett, Michael A. Cheah, Zahra Takhshid & Felix Wu,
Panel 2: Modern Trends and Internet Speech,
40
Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J.
387
(2022).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cardozoaelj/vol40/iss2/5
Included in
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons