Publication Date



University of Illinois Law Review


This Article shows that as Bankruptcy Code section 506(b) is currently written, postdefault interest rates are prohibited when the default is an “ipso facto event” — a filing for bankruptcy or insolvency as the event of a default. Yet some courts have insisted on postdefault interest in situations reinstating a loan agreement and have been ignoring restrictions on pendency interest to permit oversecured creditors from obtaining penalty rates of interest. This Article argues that those holdings violate section 506(b) and Supreme Court precedent. It begins with an analysis of ipso facto defaults, showing that the Bankruptcy Code prohibits ipso facto clauses even in nonexecutory contracts. The Article then examines regular monetary defaults. Noting that the Supreme Court only allows compensatory market rates to oversecured creditors, high default interest rates will never be a proxy for the market rate as they constitute penalties. Similarly, the Article argues that the “cure” of loan agreements allowed by reorganization chapters is a compensatory concept, also requiring the market rate of interest. Finally, the Article concludes by arguing that the Bankruptcy Code applies to solvent and insolvent debtors, and thus ipso facto clauses are prohibited and section 506(b) requires compensatory, not punitive, rates even in solvent bankruptcy cases.





First Page


Last Page



University of Illinois College of Law


bankruptcy, postdefault, interest rates


Bankruptcy Law | Contracts | Law


Illinois ABI Symposium on Chapter 11 Reform



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.