Publication Date
7-2014
Journal
Theoretical Inquiries in Law
Abstract
Binding arbitration is generally less available in tort suits than in contract suits because most tort plaintiffs do not have a pre-dispute contract with the defendant, and are unlikely to consent to arbitration after the occurrence of an unforeseen injury. But the Federal Arbitration Act applies to all "contract[s] evincing a transaction involving commerce, " including contracts for healthcare and medical services. Given the broad trend towards arbitration in nearly every other business-to-consumer industry, coupled with some rollbacks in tort reform measures that have traditionally favored medical professionals in the judicial system, it is very possible that we may witness in the near future more medical contracts containing arbitration provisions. As a consequence, all manner of tort claims (including negligence, loss of chance, and other allegations of medical malpractice resulting in physical and psychological injury) might be hashed out in the sequestered universe of arbitration.
Volume
15
First Page
671
Publisher
Tel Aviv University
Disciplines
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Elder Law | Labor and Employment Law | Law
Recommended Citation
Myriam E. Gilles,
Operation Arbitration: Privatizing Medical Malpractice Claims,
15
Theoretical Inq. L.
671
(2014).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/776
Included in
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Elder Law Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons