Publication Date



UCLA Law Review


This Article proposes that, as a copyright work ages, the scope of fair use, especially as to derivative works and uses, should expand. This is because the "market" for a copyrighted work has a temporal dimension; the copyrighted work has a market of a fixed number of years. In considering the fourth element of § 107 fair use, courts have discussed two kinds of situations in which the market for a plaintiff's work can be adversely affected: (1) situations where a particular defendant's action adversely affected the plaintiffs market, and (2) situations where the defendant's action, if it became "widespread," would adversely affect the plaintiffs market. But in the second situation, when the alleged infringement occurs becomes important. The later the alleged infringement occurs in the copyright term, the less "widespread" the practice could become in relation to the total market that the copyrighted work will enjoy over its term of protection. Further support for the idea that fair use should become broader in the last period of the copyright term comes from the basic investment structure of copyrighted works. The Article then discusses some potential problems and complications for this "fair use across time" analysis.



First Page



UCLA School of Law


Intellectual Property Law | Law



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.