Files

Download

Download Full Text (1.8 MB)

Description

A striking aspect of the current American cultural divide is divergent attitudes towards expertise, generally, and masking and vaccination to mitigate the Covid-19 pandemic, specifically. Liberal pundits profess shock that Red State America won’t just ‘trust the science’. On the right, politicians and television personalities reject mandates in the name of ‘freedom’.

Lacanian discourse theory gives insight into this. The rejection of expertise is an example of an ‘hysteric discourse’ challenging a ‘university discourse’: the regime of experts. An hysteric discourse is a critique of rules imposed by experts by the subjects-subjected-to them. Hysteria can lead, in turn, to a ‘master discourse’ which rules through authority alone, without justification by external norms. I show how this helps explain the personality cult of love for Donald Trump. In addition, I suggest how these three discourses relate to law and jurisprudence.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.3366/legal.2022.0037

Publication Date

2022

Volume

2

Publisher

Legalities: The Journal of Law and Society in Australia and New Zealand

First Page

150

Disciplines

Jurisprudence | Law | Law and Economics | Property Law and Real Estate

Download

Share

COinS