Files
Download Full Text (157 KB)
Description
The states' income tax systems are important repositories of experience which confirm the administrative benefits of citizenship-based taxation. Domicile today plays an important role in state tax systems as a gap-filler when more objective statutory residence laws fail to assign any state of residence to the taxpayer. Citizenship is an administrable proxy for domicile and serves a similar gap-filling role in the federal taxation of individuals whose income and activities straddle across national boundaries.
The states' difficulties enforcing domicile-based taxation highlight the administrative benefits of citizenship-based taxation. As long as residence is understood for tax purposes in terms of domicile, citizenship is an efficient proxy for such domicile. The states' experience defining residence supports the United States' citizenship-based approach to federal income taxation. Under the Internal Revenue Code, citizenship serves as an administrable proxy for domicile and fulfills the same gap-filling function played by domicile under the states' income taxes.
Publication Date
Winter 2017
Volume
38
Publisher
Michigan Journal of International Law
First Page
271
Keywords
income tax, state income tax, citizenship, domicile
Disciplines
Jurisdiction | Law | Taxation-State and Local | Taxation-Transnational
Recommended Citation
Edward A.,
Defining Residence for Income Tax Purposes: Domicile as Gap-Filler, Citizenship as Proxy and Gap-Filler,
38
Michigan Journal of International Law
271
(2017).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/446
Comments
Special Feature: Tax Symposium