Publication Date

2004

Journal

Judicature

Abstract

We welcome Mr. Korzeniewski's efforts at clarifying some of the epidemiological concepts included in our original paper. If anything, however, his critique only reinforces our fundamental point: that some courts, by applying inflexible rules of admissibility, are missing the complex and multi-disciplined dynamics underlying scientific assessments of causality. By so doing, these courts are preventing the factfinders from considering evidence that scientists would find relevant and even persuasive, thereby taking the legal system farther from rather than closer to the truth.

Volume

88

First Page

139

Publisher

Bolch Judicial Institute of Duke Law School

Disciplines

Law

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.