Publication Date
Summer 1997
Journal
Florida State University Law Review
Abstract
The ten reasons outlined in this article demonstrate that a mediator’s giving advice, making assessments and stating opinions — particularly where the mediator presses parties to accept a particular opinion, outcome or assessment — are inconsistent with the role of a mediator.
Volume
24
Issue
4
First Page
937
Last Page
948
Publisher
Florida State University College of Law
Keywords
Mediation, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Disciplines
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Law
Recommended Citation
Lela P. Love,
The Top Ten Reasons Why Mediators Should Not Evaluate,
24
Fla. St. U. L. Rev.
937
(1997).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/363
Comments
Symposium