Publication Date
1997
Journal
Florida State University Law Review
Abstract
The ten reasons outlined in this article demonstrate that a mediator’s giving advice, making assessments and stating opinions — particularly where the mediator presses parties to accept a particular opinion, outcome or assessment — are inconsistent with the role of a mediator.
Volume
24
First Page
937
Publisher
Florida State University College of Law
Keywords
Mediation, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Disciplines
Law
Recommended Citation
Lela P. Love,
The Top Ten Reasons Why Mediators Should Not Evaluate,
24
Fla. St. U. L. Rev.
937
(1997).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/363
