Document Type
Amicus Brief
Publication Date
7-3-2024
Case Name
Stefanik v. Hochul
Abstract
This document presents a legal brief submitted by amici curiae in a case involving prominent Republican plaintiffs challenging the constitutionality of New York State's absentee voting provisions. The brief emphasizes the fundamental importance of voting as enshrined in the New York Constitution, particularly Article II, which guarantees suffrage to all qualified citizens. It argues that the Constitution's democracy principle supports broad access to the electoral process, countering the plaintiffs' claims that the absentee voting provisions are overly restrictive. The amici curiae assert that the legislative authority to expand voting access is consistent with the overarching democratic commitments of the Constitution. The brief also critiques the plaintiffs' interpretation of the relevant constitutional provisions, advocating for a holistic understanding of the Constitution that prioritizes inclusivity and the protection of voting rights. Ultimately, the amici urge the court to uphold the Appellate Division's decision and affirm the legitimacy of the absentee voting law as a means to enhance democratic participation.
Recommended Citation
Codrington, Wilfred U. III and Pollack, Michael, "Brief for Amici Curiae New York State Legal Scholars in Support of Defendants-Respondents" (2024). Faculty Amicus Briefs. 39.
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-briefs/39
