Publication Date
4-2024
Journal
Georgetown Law Journal
Abstract
The buzz surrounding the Metaverse has been growing steadily for the past couple of years, but the tax implications of this novel ecosystem remain fuzzy to most tax scholars. Such uncertainty is concerning, given the potential and momentum of this emerging technology. Although the Metaverse evolved from online video games focused only on user consumption, it now allows users to produce income and accumulate wealth entirely within the Metaverse. Current law seems to defer taxation of such until a realization or cash-out event. This Article challenges this approach and offers novel arguments justifying Metaverse taxation.
Because economic activity within the Metaverse satisfies the Haig– Simons and Glenshaw Glass definitions of income, its exclusion will create a tax haven. Tax policy can also play an essential role in regulating the virtual economy. Furthermore, this emerging technology allows policymakers to modernize the tax system. The Metaverse’s ability to record all digital activity and track individual wealth can offer governments a unique opportunity to tax income immediately upon receipt and thus overcome the traditional realization requirement and its incentive for tax deferral. Immediate taxation, such as a mark-to-market system, would be a more efficient and fairer approach so long as it could overcome intrinsic valuation and liquidity problems.
Therefore, this Article proposes that income and wealth within the Metaverse should be subject to immediate taxation. As support, it considers the tax implications of self-created virtual assets (like non-fungible tokens (NFTs)), loot drops, intra-metaverse exchanges, inter-metaverse exchanges, and cash-for-virtual-goods exchanges. It also endorses the proposal for Unliquidated Tax Reserve Accounts (ULTRAs) as a way to implement mark-to-market taxation that resolves the valuation and liquidity issues of immediate taxation. Finally, it demonstrates that governments can use the Metaverse as a laboratory for experimenting with cutting-edge policy, which may benefit broader audiences beyond tax policymakers interested in the Metaverse’s future.
Volume
112
First Page
787
Publisher
Georgetown University Law Center
Keywords
metaverse, blockchain, cryptocurrency, NFTs, non-fungible tokens, realization, mark-to-market, MTM, tax deferral
Disciplines
Law | Law and Society | Tax Law
Recommended Citation
Young Ran (Christine) Kim,
Taxing the Metaverse,
112
Geo. L.J.
787
(2024).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/920
