Publication Date

Winter 2004

Journal

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

Abstract

The 1993 amendments to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure successfully reduced both the number of sanctions motions and the chilling effect on meritorious claims, contrary to initial concerns that weaker sanctions would increase frivolous filings. By introducing a safe harbor provision and altering the timing of Rule 11 motions, the amendments mitigated hindsight bias and encouraged the withdrawal of non-meritorious claims without penalty. Empirical evidence, including judicial surveys and a decline in sanctions motions, confirms the amendments' effectiveness in balancing deterrence of frivolous litigation with protection of legitimate claims.

Volume

37

Issue

3

First Page

599

Last Page

644

Publisher

Loyola Law School

Disciplines

Courts | Law

Download

Included in

Courts Commons

Share

COinS