Publication Date
11-2013
Journal
Vanderbilt Law Review
Abstract
The article proposes a framework for regulating commercial litigation investment by drawing analogies to existing legal norms in similar economic activities. It argues that contract law, rather than tort law, is better suited to address the risks and challenges inherent in this growing market. The analysis emphasizes the importance of aligning legal norms with the economic realities of litigation investment, particularly in the commercial sector, where the stakes and dynamics differ significantly from consumer litigation. The authors advocate for a regulatory approach that balances protection against opportunism with the need to maintain efficient outcomes.
Volume
66
Issue
6
First Page
1831
Last Page
1888
Publisher
Vanderbilt University Law School
Disciplines
Commercial Law | Contracts | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Recommended Citation
Anthony J. Sebok & W. B. Wendel,
Duty in the Litigation-Investment Agreement: The Choice Between Tort and Contract Norms when the Deal Breaks Down,
66
Vand. L. Rev.
1831
(2013).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1497
Included in
Commercial Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons

Comments
19th Annual Institute for Law and Economic Policy Conference: The Economics of Aggregate Litigation