Publication Date
Winter 2001
Journal
Washington and Lee Law Review
Abstract
The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires states to respect and recognize the legal decisions of other states, but its application is limited when it comes to judgments that attempt to control future behavior or infringe on a state's sovereignty. The article argues that while the clause ensures finality and uniformity, it does not obligate states to enforce sister-state injunctions or orders that dictate conduct beyond their borders. This distinction is particularly evident in cases involving family law, where states retain flexibility to modify or ignore prior judgments based on evolving circumstances, such as the best interests of a child.
Volume
58
Issue
1
First Page
47
Last Page
108
Publisher
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Disciplines
Conflict of Laws | Constitutional Law | Jurisprudence | Law
Recommended Citation
Stewart E. Sterk,
The Muddy Boundaries Between Res Judicata and Full Faith and Credit,
58
Wash. & Lee L. Rev.
47
(2001).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1158