Case Number
HCJ 1074/93
Date Decided
4-10-1995
Decision Type
Original
Document Type
Full Opinion
Abstract
Facts: The second petitioner, the Bezeq Corporation, had a monopoly in the field of providing telephone services in Israel. When the Government decided to allow competition in this field, the General Federation of Labour feared that the restriction of the monopoly would affect the jobs and rights of Bezeq’s employees, and it therefore gave notice of a strike. The petitioners applied to the Regional Labour Court for an injunction against the strike. The injunction was given, but the National Labour Court overturned it on appeal. The petitioners then petitioned the High Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the National Labour Court.
Held: Strikes can be divided into three categories: (1) economic strikes, which oppose an action that clearly and immediately harms employees, and are considered legitimate; (2) political strikes, which oppose a general policy of the Government, and are not considered legitimate; (3) quasi-political strikes, which oppose an act that is not directly connected with terms of employment, but do affect them directly. Quasi-political strikes only justify a short protest.
In this case, it was not proved that the restriction of Bezeq’s monopoly would clearly and immediately harm Bezeq’s employees. Therefore at most it could be a quasi-political strike, which justifies a short protest strike. Therefore the Regional Labour Court had been correct in issuing an injunction against the extended strike.
Petition granted.
Keywords
Administrative Law -- Competent authority, Administrative Law -- Judicial review, Constitutional Law -- Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty, Labor -- Strikes
Recommended Citation
Levin, Dov; Cheshin, Mishael; and Tal, Tzevi Eliyahu, "Attorney General v. National Labour Court" (1995). Translated Opinions. 67.
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/iscp-opinions/67