Cardozo Law Review
Abstract
Peter, a pedestrian, negligently crosses a street without carefully checking the vehicular traffic. Doris, a motorist, negligently speeds and strikes Peter, causing him injuries.
In Anglo-American jurisdictions, Peter's recovery against Doris will likely be reduced, if not eliminated, under the doctrine of contributory (or comparative) negligence. And it might seem obvious that a plaintiff who is "at fault" should not fully recover against a tortious defendant. But the grounds for that conclusion are not at all obvious, once one considers the following problems.
Keywords
Contributory Negligence, Torts, Negligence
Disciplines
Law | Torts
Recommended Citation
Kenneth W. Simons,
The Puzzling Doctrine of Contributory Negligence,
16
Cardozo L. Rev.
1693
(1995).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/clr/vol16/iss5/9